Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Sep 2008 07:50 UTC
Apple The situation regarding Apple's App Store for the iPhone is getting weirder by the day. Several applications have been rejected from the App Store based on seemingly dubious claims such as duplication of functionality (even though they didn't duplicate anything), or alikeness to default applications. Two such cases made headline news over the past few days; Podcaster and MailWrangler. The developers of these applications openly protested against these rejections, and apparently, Apple doesn't really like that. Apple now reiterates that rejections fall under the NDA, prohibiting developers from speaking up about rejections.
Thread beginning with comment 331232
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Apple vs Google
by Googol on Wed 24th Sep 2008 08:10 UTC in reply to "Apple vs Google"
Googol
Member since:
2006-11-24

I hope Apple meets their history here - would serve them right. So, Apple phone, please go the way of Firewire, which co-coincidently is the way of the dodo, too... Apple really learns its lessons harder than a retarded child and you guys are no help in buying their crap ;)

Reply Parent Score: 20

RE[2]: Apple vs Google
by Kroc on Wed 24th Sep 2008 08:59 in reply to "RE: Apple vs Google"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

I get your sentiment; but I don't understand the Firewire dig?
I love Firewire. It freakin' works. USB hard disks are painfully, woefully slow. Firewire is a really good standard, and it only didn't catch on [in the PC world] because of cheapo PC manufacturers not wanting to pay the licencing cost.

My 2003, 40GB 3G Firewire iPod transfers songs 2~4x faster than my 2006 5G USB2 iPod.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[3]: Apple vs Google
by PlatformAgnostic on Wed 24th Sep 2008 09:32 in reply to "RE[2]: Apple vs Google"
PlatformAgnostic Member since:
2006-01-02

Sorta agreed. Without firewire, my job would involve an awful lot of waiting (firewire has some pretty slick special affordances for kernel debugging and is hundreds of times faster than the RS-232 Null Modem alternative).

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: Apple vs Google
by 3rdalbum on Wed 24th Sep 2008 13:38 in reply to "RE[2]: Apple vs Google"
3rdalbum Member since:
2008-05-26

Not really - heaps of PC motherboards have Firewire. Both my computers (a cheapie and an expensive one) have Firewire ports.

Firewire is a bit of a white elephant. For ordinary consumer-level devices there's USB. For ultra-fast external hard disks there's eSATA. Firewire is the domain of Mini-DV-camera owners, kernel programmers, and black hats.

Typical Apple BTW - encouraging a standard with a showstopper security problem.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Apple vs Google
by BallmerKnowsBest on Wed 24th Sep 2008 16:26 in reply to "RE[2]: Apple vs Google"
BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

Firewire is a really good standard, and it only didn't catch on [in the PC world] because of cheapo PC manufacturers not wanting to pay the licencing cost.


Cheapo PCs... like the MacBook Air?

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: Apple vs Google
by walnut tree on Thu 25th Sep 2008 21:26 in reply to "RE[2]: Apple vs Google"
walnut tree Member since:
2005-11-15

Firewire is a really good standard, and it only didn't catch on [in the PC world] because of cheapo PC manufacturers not wanting to pay the licencing cost.


Well, there are two ways to spin this story - one is to say that PC manufacturers were too cheap to pay the royalty fees that Apple wanted. The other is to say that Apple set their royalty price too high for component manufacturers (who were already operating under tight margins). See these stories for more details

http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG19990115S0019

http://news.com.com/2100-1040_3-220209.html

Intel offered component makers the USB technology royalty-free which no doubt helped USB gain ascendancy despite its initial inferiority in terms of speed.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Apple vs Google
by tyrione on Wed 24th Sep 2008 10:38 in reply to "RE: Apple vs Google"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

I hope Apple meets their history here - would serve them right. So, Apple phone, please go the way of Firewire, which co-coincidently is the way of the dodo, too... Apple really learns its lessons harder than a retarded child and you guys are no help in buying their crap ;)


Somehow, somewhere, in your mind a highspeed serial transport that is taking over the auto, aerospace and other fields that already has the DV camcorder industry and it's commercial breathren is not successful because your freakin' external drives, music players and cheap digital cameras don't come with Firewire?

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: Apple vs Google
by BallmerKnowsBest on Wed 24th Sep 2008 16:24 in reply to "RE[2]: Apple vs Google"
BallmerKnowsBest Member since:
2008-06-02

Firewire is so successful that even Apple has been phasing it out.

Reply Parent Score: 2