Linked by David Adams on Wed 24th Sep 2008 22:44 UTC, submitted by snydeq
Thread beginning with comment 331451
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Solaris is not 'whiz-bang'!
by Adurbe on Thu 25th Sep 2008 14:21
in reply to "RE: Solaris is not 'whiz-bang'!"
RE[3]: Solaris is not 'whiz-bang'!
by segedunum on Thu 25th Sep 2008 18:45
in reply to "RE[2]: Solaris is not 'whiz-bang'!"







Member since:
2005-07-24
But we don't have Dtrace and ZFS. Solaris does, indeed, have its whiz-bang aspects and should get credit for that. Other aspects of Solaris can seem like they're from out of the stone age. But still.
Edited 2008-09-25 14:08 UTC