Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Thu 25th Sep 2008 17:55 UTC, submitted by fsmag
Thread beginning with comment 331552
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: WebKit/Chrome/Safari
by grfgguvf on Fri 26th Sep 2008 16:12
in reply to "RE: WebKit/Chrome/Safari"
Why does Epiphany-WebKit need to be delayed until 2.26? WebKit is ready (see Chrome), it is ready on Linux too (Konqueror, etc). I'd very much love to see it in 2.24... Especially because Mozilla and Firefox development is dying as a result of Google entering the browser wars (and hiring away talent, etc).
RE[3]: WebKit/Chrome/Safari
by sbergman27 on Fri 26th Sep 2008 17:36
in reply to "RE[2]: WebKit/Chrome/Safari"
Why does Epiphany-WebKit need to be delayed until 2.26?
Webkit is ready, but the interface integration is not. Cookies and password management are a work in progress. Adblock is not working yet. Proxies are not working yet. And details like "copy link location". It looks like a reasonable amount to get nailed down in 6 months though. I believe that a lot of the work is a result of getting gecko's tendrils out of the existing code.
I'm as anxious as you are. And I'm sure the devs are even more so.
Edited 2008-09-26 17:38 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-24
Select a different theme.
This is being done. In six months, when Gnome 2.26 comes out, WebKit will be *the* supported rendering engine, and then the fun can really start. Gecko has really tied the devs hands in a lot of ways. WebKit gives them much more flexibility. Mozilla only ever really considers FF when making design decisions.
I'm running from webkit and epiphany trunk, which is much further along than what is in epiphany-webkit for Gnome 2.24.
To the person who asked if you can run side by side, the answer is yes. You end up with epiphany-browser and epiphany-webkit binaries.