Linked by David Adams on Tue 30th Sep 2008 02:26 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 331905
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: That's all we need... another distro
by r_a_trip on Tue 30th Sep 2008 14:03
in reply to "That's all we need... another distro"
If it's binary compatible to Fedora 10, what is the harm? Sounds rather convenient to have Fedora + Livna in a compatible Distro. One less action to perform to get multimedia working. Just pop it in, install and run. Exactly what Linux "needs" to be "ready for the Desktop".
But then again, some people get panick attacks when they are confronted with the choice in breakfast cereals at the supermarket... So another respin may not be your cup of tea.
RE[2]: That's all we need... another distro
by sbergman27 on Tue 30th Sep 2008 14:23
in reply to "RE: That's all we need... another distro"
But then again, some people get panick attacks when they are confronted with the choice in breakfast cereals at the supermarket...
Yeah, I always had trouble deciding between Quisp and Quake.
Actually, in a situation like this, where the changes are tiny and are what the users do anyway, it's the trademark issues that are responsible for any actual confusion. Instead of being able to call it something sensible like "Fedora+Multimedia 10", it has to be called "Omega 10", or "Pink Beret 10", or "Orange Sombrero 10". Ditto for applications like "Frost-Ferret".
So another respin may not be your cup of tea.
Definitely Lipton on that one! :-)
Edited 2008-09-30 14:35 UTC







Member since:
2007-02-12
Another fork.