Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 1st Oct 2008 22:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 332129
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Don't forget Cinepaint. It looks similar to Gimp but is more advanced, rich in features and used in industrial Studios like Dreamworks
Good point. I didn't know about Cinepaint. It looks as though it solves GIMP's lack of support for more than 8 bits per channel, but that it doesn't solve GIMPs GUI issues.
http://www.cinepaint.org/about.html
Shame about the GUI though:
http://www.cinepaint.org/pix/linux/index.html
Anyway, the more solutions the better, I believe. This way, more people are likely to find what they want. It is also more valuable counterpoint to the FUDsters who would still to this day try to claim that "you can't do professional photo editing on Linux".
I've (tried to) use Cinepaint quite a bit and I would hardly call it more advanced and feature rich than Gimp. The only thing it really has going for it is that it can handle more than 8 bits pr channel and supports file formats commonly used in the movie industry. Beyond that it lags behind Gimp in almost every way.
Cinepaint is a dead end. They've forked the GIMP and added 16bbp and 32bbp support. But they have no concept other that that. GIMP's GEGL approach is much more sane and structured. And even it took years to get GEGL (and BABL, for the matter) to the levels they are today, GIMP/GEGL are a solid foundation to work on.







Member since:
2007-02-17
The one other contender would be Krita, wouldn't it?
http://www.koffice.org/krita/
With KOffice 2.0 (now in beta release) Krita 2.0 will gain significant capability, and also the ability to run on Windows.
It doesn't seem that far off to me, though I'm not really familiar with this application area.