Linked by Rahul on Tue 4th Nov 2008 06:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 336264
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: yet another useless fork
by siride on Tue 4th Nov 2008 14:22
in reply to "RE[2]: yet another useless fork"
RE[4]: yet another useless fork
by qortra on Tue 4th Nov 2008 16:39
in reply to "RE[3]: yet another useless fork"
cruft has been removed from the [X.Org] codebase.
I absolutely know that is has, and I truly am grateful for the work they've done on it. However, speaking as a software engineer, sometimes a total rewrite is required to move ahead - refactoring has its limits. Moreover, this project appears to be a complete paradigm shift from the old-style X.Org server, and that might be what is called for to solve some of the problems mentioned in the article.







Member since:
2005-10-05
True, but that can be said of all pre-alpha software. The fact is that the old X.Org code-base is old and has a ton of cruft. One way or another, the free software community needs to consider replacing it - if Wayland merely gets people to start thinking about doing so, I say Job Well Done.