To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think the interesting point to get here is that GTK/Clearlooks/Cairo didn't work well right out of the box. What he would have had to do to make them work correctly would have required knowledge he didn't have, and that he shouldn't be expected to have.
He's installing a Cairo-based theme out of a CVS repository, because it hasn't been released yet. It's not expected to work out of the box. He's complaining about the performance of it, even though it's CVS code that the author warns is slow. What exactly is he expecting?
I think the interesting point to get here is that GTK/Clearlooks/Cairo didn't work well right out of the box.
I think you're missing something - his comments aren't about either GTK, Clearlooks, or Cairo as shipped with Ubuntu. They're about an unreleased next-generation version of Clearlooks that he installed from CVS code, and are completely off topic as far as the actual review of Ubuntu is concerned.
I think you're missing something - his comments aren't about either GTK, Clearlooks, or Cairo as shipped with Ubuntu....
No, I got that.
I also got that the the version of Gnome they shipped was supposed to be built on Cairo, and that Cairo's hope of greater efficiency is supposed to come with hardware acceleration. The reviewer noticed that the theme shipped didn't use Cairo and the acceleration wasn't there, so the interface was slow, something at odds with how Cairo and Gnome 2.12 were being reputed.
So, he tried to fix this. This reaction and this result are not surprising given how the version of Ubuntu was configured as shipped.
I was trying to point out that this experience that the reviewer went through should serve as a valuable object lesson to those composing the eventual release of 5.10 - that a moderately informed (by Linux standards) user thought it was slower than expected and couldn't make it faster using the available methods.
If I was a developer of Ubuntu, I would want to know this.





Member since:
2005-07-06
I think the interesting point to get here is that GTK/Clearlooks/Cairo didn't work well right out of the box. What he would have had to do to make them work correctly would have required knowledge he didn't have, and that he shouldn't be expected to have.
Of course this is just a preview. This review just brings up points that should be considered by those fixing 5.10 for release.