Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Nov 2008 09:39 UTC, submitted by Reyk
Thread beginning with comment 337064
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The problem is not so much that they're rewritting CVS with a BSD license. The problem is that these days pretty much everybody is running away from CVS to distributed systems like git or mercurial.
So basically OpenBSD is wasting the few time they have into rewritting a outdated source management system.
Except they're not simply a making feature-by-feature, bug-by-bug reimplementation of CVS. They're making a better CVS that fits their needs. They're leaving out things they consider bloat in CVS and improving the stuff they don't think works as well as it should. Basically they considered the old CVS too stagnant and too bloated, so they made a better one.





Member since:
2005-07-07
I will assume that the use of the word "immature" means lacking features in your vernacular.
What you consider a waste of time is not considered a waste of time on their part. They (the core devs) are a group driven by philosophical wants. For them, the license issue is very important so that is where they spend the majority of the time.