Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Nov 2008 21:38 UTC, submitted by pantheraleo
Thread beginning with comment 337310
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, secretaries, salesmen, advertising, marketing, accounting.
Of course if you got rid of all of those people you'll never get any new customers or orders or payments or silly stuff like that. Which will quickly lead to you not needing any more engineers anyway.
How many tech companies haven't failed because people thought that great tech would more than make up for a shitty sales and marketing team.
Well, secretaries, salesmen, advertising, marketing, accounting. I'm sure they have a reasonable number of non tech related positions.
Chances are that most of the cuts will be outside of sales, marketing, accounting, and advertising, and I doubt that secretaries will see huge cuts...
I know it sounds stupid, but too many times in the past tech firms have fired their engineers before firing anyone else...
Well, our chief has said on occasions that we should never think that we (r&d, scientists, developers, IT) are more valuable for the company than the cleaning and maintenance personnel when considering the stability of the jobs/positions. Go figure.
Edited 2008-11-15 21:07 UTC







Member since:
2006-07-14
Well, secretaries, salesmen, advertising, marketing, accounting. I'm sure they have a reasonable number of non tech related positions. Although, it would be naive to assume that they wouldn't cut any engineers at all. I would be very afraid, if I was one of the devs working on an obscure java technology. Like any of these:
http://java.sun.com/othertech/index.jsp