Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Nov 2008 17:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 338193
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Linux distros are still small
by sbergman27 on Mon 24th Nov 2008 20:32
in reply to "RE[3]: Linux distros are still small"
RE[5]: Linux distros are still small
by Piranha on Mon 24th Nov 2008 20:41
in reply to "RE[4]: Linux distros are still small"
Except when you 'install' on a hard drive, it bloats out. So when talking about OS' bloatness (which is what this topic is about), you're comparing compressed to non-compressed.
Sure, it runs, but you can also enable compression on NTFS partitions. However, nobody wants to do this since it usually makes the system sluggish. It's true that 'some' compressions make reads/writes faster (at the expense of CPU cycles), but usually isn't the best compression technique out there.





Member since:
2008-06-24
You are partially correct.. Except for the fact that everything on a LiveCD is compressed substancially to fit it on a CD. It can be done like this because you're not making any changes to the core of the OS, and any new updates to it will mean a reburn of the disc. Not an issue, but figured I should point that out. Same goes for Knoppix and pretty well most LiveCDs that have that much jammed in on it.