To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Which is exactly the point. Apple wouldn't have to be cheap, they sell on the brand name. You don't buy Gucci because of the quality, you buy it because it is Gucci. It is by no means crap but you an easily get the same or better quality cheaper with other brands. No matter if we like it or not, brand names sell products.
That's true, however with Apple you're not 'just' paying for a printed logo. Their laptops tend to be streamlined, designed very well, and are quite innovative. For example, the patented Magsafe connector that they've been using on their entire notebook line for quite a number of years now. Who would have thought that using a tiny magnet could pose so useful if tripping over a cord. Not ONE company has been able to match, to my knowledge, something remotely close to that. Yes, it is patented, but it just goes to show the innovation the other companies lack.
Apples tend to be priced higher (and the upgrades even more), but if you compare the Macbook to a similar Dell, you'll find the prices aren't THAT far off. The gap between them has gotten smaller since their release of Intel chips, but you're getting a proven-stable OS, along with a laptop that's very slick. This 'Gucci' laptop easily stands out from the other 'Adidas' laptops.
Some argue the hardware is controlled. While true, it does give a uniformity which allows Apple to focus on (and prefect?) driver support, which Windows can't necessarily do as easily. At the same time, it's believed that Apple also ensures the hardware they choose is of good build quality and testing before placed in their products.
Edited 2008-11-26 16:34 UTC





Member since:
2008-11-11
very true, Apple is notorious for charging too much money for their hardware. I'm sure if they did try to enter the market they would sell it for a grand and market it as the Gucci of netbooks like they do for all their other products.