Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 25th Nov 2008 21:57 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Thread beginning with comment 338390
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
So in other words, they were indeed capable of running Vista. This thing sounds a lot more like HP being pissed because other OEM's got to put the Vista sticker on machines that are cheaper than HP than anyone being actually concerned about the consumers.
Talk about a bunch of whining pussies. Look, "capable" means capable. It doesn't mean "exceptional" or "exemplary". Anybody who buys low-end hardware and expects it to do anything more than boot and run a few apps is kidding themselves. I'm sorry. I just don't buy that whoever bought these machines expected to get top-tier performance. It sounds (to me) like some Freetard axe-grinders are trying to dredge up legal muck in an attempt to discredit Microsoft.
Edited 2008-11-29 05:18 UTC




Member since:
2005-08-18
So in other words, they were indeed capable of running Vista. This thing sounds a lot more like HP being pissed because other OEM's got to put the Vista sticker on machines that are cheaper than HP than anyone being actually concerned about the consumers.