Linked by David Adams on Sun 7th Dec 2008 02:03 UTC, submitted by HugoS
Thread beginning with comment 339598
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.cgi?when_will_perl_6_be_r...
They really only started the difficult implementation of parrot and the perl6 on haskell, and perl 6 on parrot, and perl 5 on parrot in 2005. So three years for a virtual machine, implementing two languages on the virtual machine, and another implementation of a language on top of a somewhat obscure language like Haskell in three years. Not that bad, if you ask me.
It was a long planning and design phase form 2000 to 2005, that most critics are including in the time estimate. The best explanation is that perl 6 was a community rewrite of perl 6. A community is, IMHO, always going to move slower with a design process, than a benevolent dictator.