Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Dec 2008 15:10 UTC
Editorial states: "Microsoft (or a really smart ISV) should build a full application manager for Windows, similar to what most Linux distributions do today." Most Windows applications come with their own distinctive updating mechanism (much like Mac OS X), instead of having a centralised updating location like most Linux distributions offer. While it certainly wouldn't be harmful for Windows to gain such a feature - the question remains: isn't it time we rethink program installation and management altogether?
Thread beginning with comment 340428
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: microsoft would have to let go
by judgen on Tue 16th Dec 2008 04:10 UTC in reply to "microsoft would have to let go"
Member since:

Mircosoft could be the package maintainer. And only tested and scanned submitted apps would be allowed onto the repo. Thus making the threat to the customers alot smaller than current situation where people download apps from all over the place.

Reply Parent Score: 1

jabbotts Member since:

I think it would be too much of a threat to MS and it's shareholders. They would have to host competitive software along side there own products. Wile I'd love to see the Windows Update site offering Firefox, Opera and Safari along side IE.. something about winged bacon comes to mind.

Centrlized package management would do a lot of good for the end user but it's not about them, it's about the shareholder's payoff.

Reply Parent Score: 3