Linked by David Adams on Wed 17th Dec 2008 17:15 UTC, submitted by Michael
Thread beginning with comment 340782
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There is, and it's that commercial banks and investment banks ended up all being in the same business.
Thats not an argument for it having an impact, especially when has been the investment banks that have failed and not the commercial banks.
So this is basically a crisis of unpayable debt waiting to happen. But the size of the crash was I think influenced by the amount of craziness happening in the banks and hedge funds a.o.
All this purposefully engineered by Wall Street and the Fed itself.
All this purposefully engineered by Wall Street and the Fed itself.
Yes there was like a lot of leveraging, but purposefully created it? I don't know about that.






Member since:
2006-08-09
GS is such a buzz word these days. There is no good argument that connects GS's repeal to the current crisis whatsoever. "
There is, and it's that commercial banks and investment banks ended up all being in the same business.
But I agree, it's not the only cause because the US has been on this path ever since Reagan and it's been off gold since the seventies, giving it the opportunity to have the rest of the world pay for its deficits (trade, balance of payments).
So this is basically a crisis of unpayable debt waiting to happen. But the size of the crash was I think influenced by the amount of craziness happening in the banks and hedge funds a.o.
All this purposefully engineered by Wall Street and the Fed itself.