Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Dec 2008 19:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 341863
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Here we go again...
by flanque on Tue 30th Dec 2008 01:54
in reply to "RE[4]: Here we go again..."
However, asking me to bolster your point makes you sound either lazy or unable to do so yourself.
Neither. I am just disinterested in doing so.
If memory serves me correctly though, I can recall four articles including this one by Paul. Google it and you'll see, otherwise asking me to somehow bolster your point makes you sound lazy or unable to prove I am wrong.
RE[6]: Here we go again...
by sbergman27 on Tue 30th Dec 2008 02:11
in reply to "RE[5]: Here we go again..."




Member since:
2005-12-09
... as in... ?
I mean, surely, if pressed, you could just crank out ONE, right? Here's your chance to shine! You shouldn't pass it by. Provide a link that proves your point. However, asking me to bolster your point makes you sound either lazy or unable to do so yourself.