Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 3rd Jan 2009 12:58 UTC
Windows Even though the EULA accompanying the beta build of Windows 7 prohibits the publication of benchmark results (good luck enforcing that one, Redmond), everybody and their dog will still compare the Windows 7 beta to Vista and Windows XP. Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is one of those benchmarking the beta, and according to his results, the Windows 7 beta beats both Vista and XP in just about every scenario.
Thread beginning with comment 342209
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not that I'm bothered
by SlackerJack on Sat 3rd Jan 2009 14:34 UTC
SlackerJack
Member since:
2005-11-12

It seems like thoughs benchmarks are as useless as a chocolate fireguard, all the numbers you see are 1,2,3 and Windows 7 shows halving the performance of Vista and XP.

Looks to me now that both Snow Leopard and Windows 7 really are service packs with performance tweaks, I'd rather keep my money thanks(not that I would buy them but from a outside stance I wouldn't).

Edited 2009-01-03 14:34 UTC

RE: Not that I'm bothered
by sigzero on Sat 3rd Jan 2009 15:02 in reply to "Not that I'm bothered"
sigzero Member since:
2006-01-03

I know for Snow Leopard you are mostly right. It has been touted as the "laying a foundation for the future" version.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Not that I'm bothered
by Stephen! on Sat 3rd Jan 2009 15:04 in reply to "Not that I'm bothered"
Stephen! Member since:
2007-11-24

It seems like thoughs benchmarks are as useless as a chocolate fireguard


A chocolate fireguard isn't entirely useless. You could always eat it ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 10

RE: Not that I'm bothered
by shadow_x99 on Sat 3rd Jan 2009 21:20 in reply to "Not that I'm bothered"
shadow_x99 Member since:
2006-05-12

You are right because most innovation is done under the hood (APIs, Performance Tweaks, etc...)

You are wrong because those new APIs will allow application developpers (including Apple) to channel those new APIs into NICE applications.

As an Application Developper myself, I will probably buy it

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE: Not that I'm bothered
by tyrione on Sun 4th Jan 2009 10:21 in reply to "Not that I'm bothered"
tyrione Member since:
2005-11-21

It seems like thoughs benchmarks are as useless as a chocolate fireguard, all the numbers you see are 1,2,3 and Windows 7 shows halving the performance of Vista and XP.

Looks to me now that both Snow Leopard and Windows 7 really are service packs with performance tweaks, I'd rather keep my money thanks(not that I would buy them but from a outside stance I wouldn't).


How the hell does Snow Leopard become involved in this as a service pack?

The kernel, filesystem, user space and application sets from Apple are moving to Cocoa. How is that a service pack?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Not that I'm bothered
by segedunum on Sun 4th Jan 2009 18:21 in reply to "RE: Not that I'm bothered"
segedunum Member since:
2005-07-06

The kernel, filesystem, user space and application sets from Apple are moving to Cocoa. How is that a service pack?

Errrr, because users don't give a damn about Cocoa, it isn't going to make any direct difference to them and it is purely a developer thing that Apple cocked up?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3