Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 9th Jan 2009 11:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 342843
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The point is its not the apps that matters, its the functions you'd like from these apps.
Yes, of course, but until apps are modular in a way that makes them easy to combine in various ways the apps will matter. Any interface that does away with apps before the apps have this kind of modularity is bad.
If the new palm's apps really have this kind of modularity, then that should be the big news, not the UI.
Edited 2009-01-09 13:38 UTC
I bought my first Mac because of a technology called OpenDoc. I have always thought the approach made a lot of sense. That said it is such a different approach that is causes a lot of problems for folks to grasp in practice. It is nice to see the idea make a comeback.
You can find out more about OpenDoc at wikipedia here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opendoc
I'll bet this is even more revelant here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBinder






Member since:
2008-11-18
The point is its not the apps that matters, its the functions you'd like from these apps. What I'm trying to say: All apps do right now is they're a compilation of different functions + a user interface to invoke them. This made a lot of sense when the concept was developed, as you couldn't load features on demand or were restricted by resources.
What I'm thinking is the future is a different model. In my opinion Palm is moving in this direction: Every app will publish a data model and be extensible, so that anyone can integrate their data and manipulate it. Of course some security should be applied, but the point is in order to use some specific editing feature you won't switch the model or the app entirely, just something similar to a plugin.
Huge apps, which claim to do everything the user wants are what prevents choice.