Linked by weildish on Tue 20th Jan 2009 02:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 344612
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-12-06
Not exactly necessary, but thrown in for a humorous effect as well as to make an off-topic point. It's sad, but true, and I see it everywhere I go: your average user owns a piece of junk manufactured by Dell or HP that really shouldn't be running the system installed on it. It's cheap, and the guys at Best Buy or Wal-Mart will tell you it's a great system because they don't know any better. The average user likes the price, takes the word of the sales rep as golden, and buys the under qualified machine. Now we have five hundred thousand proud owners of new computers "running" Windows Vista. And you know what I mean by "running." Just because it has the sticker on it doesn't mean it should be running it. Manufacturers stretched the truth there, and I think that's one of the reasons so many people have hated Vista so much-- it really shouldn't be running on the hardware they said it could run on-- definitely partly MS's fault for saying it could. But anyway. I'm majorly getting off topic here. Please forgive.