To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
you are undoubtedly correct
If palm released something that would not sell then im sure apple would not be interested.
it is not for me (nor you) to speculate how apple got hold of a pre to make the decision. Neither of us know and it wont further the argument of either of us.
What I don't understand is all those here at OS news insisting patents should not be used. If, as seems to be a common claim, the patents are unenforceable let it go to court. The US legal system generally is held in quite high regard. The decision on a case such as this (which I understand to be GUI related) would establish once and for all the status of patents in software and in particular software interfaces
Especially a society as litigious as the US, you think cramming courts with the task of reviewing junk patents that could have easily been disqualified by the patent office is a good idea. We should have non-technical judges presiding over detailed technological debates? How has that worked out so far?





Member since:
2008-03-17
highly technical? How did apple engineers get their hands on a pre so that they could determine any infringement?
Apple is just talking crap in order to intimidate. I would be willing to accept if it was a blatant copy (ie the meizu m8 or whatever). However, apple has seemingly left them (meizu) alone and are only going against palm because they have created a product that potentially can usurp the iphone's crown.
Edited 2009-01-25 23:13 UTC