Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Feb 2009 07:05 UTC
Apple Apple has always been about moving forward, about pressing customers to buy the latest and greatest. Product pacing has been high in Cupertino (except for the Mac Mini, obviously), and this is obviously a good thing if you're an Apple bean counter. Most Apple fans more or less accept this planned obsolescence without question, but the company may have just gone a little too far.
Thread beginning with comment 347043
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That's a shame
by Budd on Wed 4th Feb 2009 08:14 UTC
Budd
Member since:
2005-07-08

So,Leopard will be the last OS my Pro G4 Quicksilver will see. And that's a shame because Snow Leopard supposed to be even snappier compared with 10.5. The sad part is that I can't use the Apple monitor that I have (1280x1024) anymore. I have no use for it otherwise (or maybe I can hook it to the MBP , downgrading the resolution). But hey, maybe it's time to buy some new gear.

Edited 2009-02-04 08:21 UTC

Reply Score: 1

RE: That's a shame
by alcibiades on Wed 4th Feb 2009 10:15 in reply to "That's a shame"
alcibiades Member since:
2005-10-12

Get a hackintosh, and carry on using your monitor. It will be cheap, fast, stable and expandable. If you don't want to do it yourself from scratch, you've got two choices, one is psystar, the other is efi-x. If you have someone put it together for you, get a gigabyte board and core 2 as specified in the macintouch review of efi-x, and you'll get a better quality main board than anything Apple will sell you at any price. And if you go for the Antec case they used, you'll even get a far better case with it.

You also can get a dual core Duo, rather than the ridiculously expensive quad core the macs use. Yes, they are going to be faster. A tiny amount faster for a huge amount more cash. We are well into diminishing returns at this point. And i7 is coming towards every buyer of a full priced Pro at this point, its like a bullet aimed right at your investment, just as the core 2 was a bullet aimed at your PPC investment. Planned obsolescence, here we come again.

The issue is never that you can duplicate the Mac for less. You cannot and should not want to. The issue is always that you can get something better fitted for purpose for far, far less.

Reply Parent Score: 7

RE[2]: That's a shame
by Sabon on Wed 4th Feb 2009 16:11 in reply to "RE: That's a shame"
Sabon Member since:
2005-07-06

"You also can get a dual core Duo, rather than the ridiculously expensive quad core the macs use.

The only Macs that use quad core are the Mac Pros (not to be confused with MacBook Pros). No iMac or any other mac currently has quad processors.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: That's a shame
by Liquidator on Wed 4th Feb 2009 12:56 in reply to "That's a shame"
Liquidator Member since:
2007-03-04

When you're an Apple customer, you're not supposed to really care about how much you spend in your $#!% ;)

Introducing the iProduct...
http://cache.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/iProduct.gif

Reply Parent Score: 8

RE[2]: That's a shame
by DeadFishMan on Wed 4th Feb 2009 13:21 in reply to "RE: That's a shame"
DeadFishMan Member since:
2006-01-09

When you're an Apple customer, you're not supposed to really care about how much you spend in your $#!% ;)

Introducing the iProduct...
http://cache.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/iProduct.gif


lol... That's a classic! I will always love that iProduct ad!

Reply Parent Score: 2