Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Feb 2009 13:24 UTC, submitted by Michael
Thread beginning with comment 347830
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by averycfay
by pantheraleo on Mon 9th Feb 2009 15:59
in reply to "RE: Comment by averycfay"
RE[2]: Comment by averycfay
by dvzt on Mon 9th Feb 2009 17:25
in reply to "RE: Comment by averycfay"
Check explanation here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=91438&tstart=0
RE[2]: Comment by averycfay
by kaiwai on Tue 10th Feb 2009 07:48
in reply to "RE: Comment by averycfay"
Check explanation here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=91438&tsta...
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=91438&tsta...
Thank you for the link but it doesn't change the fact that the GCC included with OpenSolaris needs to be upgraded immediately - and it should have been done years ago. This has been a known problem in Solaris and yet no one can be bothered sorting it out.
Why hasn't Sun got its act together and updated its GCC bundled with Solaris? its been a known issue for year - it isn't as though it something that has cropped up recently. They wonder why people keep going back to Linux from Solaris - the issues are right in their face, too bad they ignore then in favour of blaming the boogyman.




(*no bashing intended!*)
Member since:
2005-08-29
I'm genuinely surprised at how poorly OpenSolaris did in their tests. It won 1/19 tests and that was java-based. Also, these seem to be somewhat realistic tests unlike the last set of benchmarks posted (how many clicks does it take to install?).