Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Feb 2009 12:55 UTC
Google A major complaint about Google's Chrome web browser has been that so far, it is still not available on anything other than Windows. Google promised to deliver Chrome to Mac OS X and Linux as well, but as it turns out, this is a little harder than they anticipated, Ben Goodger, Google's Chrome interface lead, has explained in an email. It has also been revealed what toolkit the Linux version of Chrome will use: Gtk+.
Thread beginning with comment 348940
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: OBVIOUS CHOICE
by sbergman27 on Sat 14th Feb 2009 17:33 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: OBVIOUS CHOICE"
sbergman27
Member since:
2005-07-24

Don't blame Ubuntu. Granted, Ubuntu is a very important one. But is there a distro anywhere on which Epiphany is the default? I suppose, perhaps, it is on Nuisance. But I'm not even certain of that.

The browser is *very* arguably the most important app in the stack. And Gnome throws theirs crumbs just to keep it alive. I'm a Gnome advocate. But their treatment of Epiphany gets a "Boo! Hiss!" from me.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: OBVIOUS CHOICE
by J. M. on Sat 14th Feb 2009 17:54 in reply to "RE[4]: OBVIOUS CHOICE"
J. M. Member since:
2005-07-24

And what more can they do about it? They are working on Epiphany, they make it their default web browser and then they make it available. And then comes Ubuntu et al., pick GNOME, throw away Epiphany and include Firefox instead.

I'm not saying it's Ubuntu's fault, but it's not GNOME's fault either - the Linux distros do it not because Epiphany is bad, but because Firefox is extremely popular, most web sites don't ignore Firefox, it's the de facto standard non-MS browser, people expect it to be there, Windows users who try Linux for the first time are happy when they find a web browser they're familiar with, they don't care about alternatives...

There's nothing GNOME can do about it (maybe except for making Epiphany 100 times better than Firefox - that's the only way it could generate some interest, but of course that's impossible).

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: OBVIOUS CHOICE
by sbergman27 on Sat 14th Feb 2009 18:05 in reply to "RE[5]: OBVIOUS CHOICE"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

And what more can they do about it?

Actually devote some resources to it?

but it's not GNOME's fault either

To the extent that they have ignored it, it is.

There's nothing GNOME can do about it

Yes there is. They could try. Incompatible as it is with the web, at large, even Konqueror has fared better. Because the KDE guys do seem to care about their browser.

Edited 2009-02-14 18:08 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3