Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 14th Feb 2009 12:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 349087
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Why QT? Why not GTK+?
by YEPHENAS on Sun 15th Feb 2009 12:20
in reply to "RE: Why QT? Why not GTK+?"
Show a Gtk counterpart to QGraphicsView. One that actually matches its functionality. Also, show me how to something like WolfenQt (google for it) using Gtk.
http://www.vimeo.com/374006
RE[3]: Why QT? Why not GTK+?
by ardor on Sun 15th Feb 2009 13:03
in reply to "RE[2]: Why QT? Why not GTK+?"
Clutter is a very nice library, and this patch indeed looks nice, but is a fraction of what QGraphicsView can do. Moreover, it is trivial to accelerate QGraphicsView with Qt - just put the view inside a QGLWidget. It is even possible to put GL widget inside GL widgets inside GL widgets etc. I hope Clutter gets integrated in Gtk, since it is the way to go.




Member since:
2009-02-15
Show a Gtk counterpart to QGraphicsView. One that actually matches its functionality. Also, show me how to something like WolfenQt (google for it) using Gtk.