Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Wed 18th Feb 2009 00:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 349619
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's not about the crowds or playing it in public.
It is about what they're selling you and 'lost sales' of audio books.
For example, let's say they sell a book for $1.00.
They also sell the audio book for $3.00.
If you have the kindle with text-to-speech then they have a lost profit opportunity.
That's their argument. I totally disagree with it
It is about what they're selling you and 'lost sales' of audio books.
For example, let's say they sell a book for $1.00.
They also sell the audio book for $3.00.
If you have the kindle with text-to-speech then they have a lost profit opportunity.
That's their argument. I totally disagree with it
I am glad you do, as there arguement is fundamentally flawed. If they sell the book for $1 and the audio book for $3 - then what is to stop them selling the e-book for $5 and making even more profit? After all, it's not as though Kindle can take the paper book, OCR it and then read it out with the emotion and drama of an audio book.




Member since:
2006-01-10
It's not about the crowds or playing it in public.
As far as I'm concerned when you buy a book, you are purchasing a personal right to the content in the book. If a technology exists to transform it to speech, wonderful. You're not buying the words... but the content.
It is about what they're selling you and 'lost sales' of audio books.
For example, let's say they sell a book for $1.00.
They also sell the audio book for $3.00.
If you have the kindle with text-to-speech then they have a lost profit opportunity.
That's their argument. I totally disagree with it
It is probably the most insane EULA they are pushing here