Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Feb 2009 10:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 350274
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Even build 7000 seems almost ready.
by darknexus on Mon 23rd Feb 2009 17:49
in reply to "RE: Even build 7000 seems almost ready."
Trouble is, if they dump that "legacy crap," they're going to piss off a lot of enterprises that depend on it. A good number of places use software that was written for NT 3.51 or 4.0 and haven't updated it. This could lose Microsoft one of their biggest markets, the corporate enterprise.
I think they could easily solve this via virtualization, and it certainly seems they are moving that way. The legacy APIs and such could easily be provided in a virtual environment, leaving the core of Windows clear. While I'm no lover of Microsoft, I don't dispise them either, and I don't imagine removing and separating out the legacy cruft is an easy task especially for a codebase as big as Windows.




Member since:
2006-01-02
I never had any issues with vista, altho it would've been better without all the legacy support. the only issue I had with it initially was with zip files, it was a little slow extracting them, so I had to use winzip or winrar, that was fixed in SP1. I used build 7000 so far, I dont see much difference, gadgets floating out in the open, then I found out you could do that in vista too. I truely wish they would dump the legacy crap