To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I agree with your sentiment completely. We need portable computers that last more than 2 - 3 hours.
As far as OLPC goes, I think the organization is a joke. The whole idea behind it was originally supposed to be to provide impoverished kids with a computer; whereas they would otherwise never have the opportunity.
These children aren't saying to themselves, "gee, I'd really like a computer, but I don't want a crappy OLPC because it won't run all the Windows software I have." That seems to be the focus of the OLPC organization though.
Considering the intended audience, who cares what Microsoft does, since Windows would actually be a hindrance to these children obtaining software and learning how to use a computer?
Edited 2009-03-15 19:24 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-06
I am all for ARM chips in netbooks and laptops. They consume way more power than CISC processors, the most annoying feature of any laptop/netbook is the fact that the batteries die too fast. I work 8 hours a day not 2.
Edited 2009-03-12 06:11 UTC