Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th Mar 2009 13:51 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Privacy, Security, Encryption Fresh from winning the PWN2OWN contest yesterday, Charlie Miller has been interviewed by ZDNet. He talks about how Mac OS X is a very simple operating system to exploit due to the lack of any form of anti-exploit features. He also explains that the underlying operating system is much more important in creating a successful exploit than the bowser, why Chrome is so hard to hack, and many other things.
Thread beginning with comment 354152
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Operating System Security
by TBPrince on Fri 20th Mar 2009 17:10 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Operating System Security"
TBPrince
Member since:
2005-07-06

Unbelievable. Here is an interview with a guy who is most definitely a better programmer than pretty much anyone on OSNews, who has been doing this longer than any of us. In this interview he says "OSX is unsecure, there are almost no hurdles to jump through to take control of a system" and you say that Apple has the most secure desktop. Are you really that delusional? At least the Windows folks can admit that it's got security issues. Apple fanboys are a rare breed, and for them to make claims like the one above is just flat out ignorance.


With all the money they pour to buy that overpriced hardware stuff, it HAS to be the most secure ;-) Mind you that they are all excited about iPhone 3.0 OS in order to get those two advanced and innovatite features:

* cut&paste;
* sending MMS out.

lol

ops! Sorry... I know it will sound trollish and I bed your (preventive) pardon ;-)

Reply Parent Score: 6