Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Mar 2009 23:26 UTC, submitted by inkslinger
Internet Explorer Recently, Microsoft released Internet Explorer 8, which boasted much better standards compliance than previous iterations of the browser. While it passed the Acid2 test, IE8 failed miserably in the Acid3 test, and many people criticised Microsoft for it. Microsoft Australia's Nick Hodge has stated that Microsoft purposefully decided not to support Acid3, because the test tests against draft standards.
Thread beginning with comment 354894
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: He should be...
by lemur2 on Wed 25th Mar 2009 01:49 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: He should be..."
Member since:

I am not sure you are making the strongest argument when you talk about a beta product and call it by the wrong name. Firefox 3.1 is now going to be released as Firefox 3.5

True. It was, however, called Firefox 3.1 beta 3 when it was tested and scored 94 out of 100.

Now you wouldn't want me to claim that Firefox 3.5 scored 94 out of 100 for Acid3 testing when Firefox 3.5 doesn't exist yet, would you? Firefox 3.1 beta 3 does exist, and it has been tested.


Reply Parent Score: 11