Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Mar 2009 23:26 UTC, submitted by inkslinger
Thread beginning with comment 354906
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-04-29
[quote]
He went on to say that Microsoft learnt its lesson with Internet Explorer 6. "Our learning comes from IE6. With IE6 we adopted some non-recommended standards and interpreted them in a certain way. The end result of that has been painful web development."
[/quote]
I have no sympathy for MS on this comment, every one with an ounce of intelligence knows that MS was thinking:
"We hold the commanding market share, everyone will program against IE, if we make the way that IE does things slightly different to other browsers then it will break sites on other browsers, ensuring that people stay with IE."
Their strategy initially worked but what they never counted on was the level of resistance that came from web developers when great alternative browsers appeared and gained popularity in the enthusiest community.
At least MS can admit that they made a mistake, but I wish that they'd stop making it sound like it was an innocent mistake.