Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Sep 2005 12:05 UTC, submitted by Luis Gonzalez
Thread beginning with comment 36076
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Bash to C++ compiler would be useful to
by ecko on Sun 25th Sep 2005 22:33
in reply to "RE: Bash to C++ compiler would be useful to"
Very very good point. The other problem is bootup is done in a serial fashion, even if apache is sleeping as it's starting up, nothing else can procede until it's done. People like to bitch that python/perl/interpreted language X are slow and bloated. If it were slow nobody would use it.




Member since:
2005-07-06
The speed of Bash, etc, is almost never the actual problem. The actual problem is usually that system startup involves lots of disk I/O through a cold cache, which is pretty much the slowest thing you can do on a computer. Even if the script was 10x as fast, it'd still spend 99% of its time sleeping.