Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 13th May 2009 10:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 363344
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
I was wondering if a more apt punishment would have to force Intel to open the specs or release the patents on one of their chips.
Sure it would really hurt Intel (perhaps too severely?) but it would also be a stark warning to them and every other company which abuses it's power that such actions will not be tolerated.
Plus, fining a company of Intels size wouldn't really affect it's business nor offer compensation to the competitors who Intel have harmed.
What's your thoughts on this idea? Too harsh / damaging or just punishment?