Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th May 2009 20:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 365050
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Sign that Linux is ready for Desktop
by Windows Sucks on Fri 22nd May 2009 23:24
in reply to "RE[6]: Sign that Linux is ready for Desktop"
Ubuntu is based on Debian testing (or maybe unstable?), not stable branch. Always has been as far as I know.
PC-BSD is awesome, if only it played better with GNOME.
PC-BSD is awesome, if only it played better with GNOME.
Ubuntu is from Debian unstable. The reason why people don't take from Debian stable is the code is very stable but WAY out of date. That is good in some cases but not good when you are trying to add new features on a quick turn around like Ubuntu does.
But there are or were: MEPIS, Xandros, Linspire, Progeny and Libranet who all used Debian as the base and added or add bells and whistles. That is nothing new.




Member since:
2009-04-08
Ubuntu is based on Debian testing (or maybe unstable?), not stable branch. Always has been as far as I know.
PC-BSD is awesome, if only it played better with GNOME.