Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th May 2009 12:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 365209
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It's not just finding a judge, it's finding a judge with right background. This type of copyright law is a fairly narrow field and most judges have little or no experience in it.
Of course the judges that do have experience in it are also probably interested enough in it have joined professional bodies related to that field. I guess it's hard to find someone with a lot of experience and interest in a field, but without any memberships or ties to organizations that share an interest in said field.
Of course the judges that do have experience in it are also probably interested enough in it have joined professional bodies related to that field.
Of course it should be fair to say that judges and other officers of the court (I.e. lawyers) should be banned from joining any professional bodies or political parties.





Member since:
2006-04-22
This is the kind of thing you would expect to happen in a country the size of that island in Lost. Does Sweden only have just a couple of judges, and were the other two out to lunch when they needed a judge?
No matter what side of the argument, I find nothing more displeasing to see such monkey business happen in the judicial system. Judges should not be members of such groups, and more importanly if they must, they should recuse themselves.
We have had several high profile court cases here in Minnesota, one of which is the ongoing Senate recount debacle, and in each case we have had judges step up to the plate and recuse themselves, or in a few cases appointed retired judges to fill the role. I can not believe that in all of Sweden they could not find one judge who is not tainted.