Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th May 2009 12:06 UTC
Legal Mid-April, the four founders of The Pirate Bay were found guilty of being accessories to breaching copyright law; they aided in breaching copyright of 33 files. As a result, they were sentenced to one year in jail and a 2.75 million EUR fine. However, it was quickly revealed that the judge in the case was heavily biased, and ever since then there's been a search for a judge who is actually not involved with any pro-copyright groups or with the lawyers working for the entertainment industry in this case. Turns out that's actually kind of hard.
Thread beginning with comment 365226
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Car analogy
by AdamW on Sun 24th May 2009 17:11 UTC in reply to "Car analogy"
Member since:

Thom should probably have worded the post better. It's not that they're 'pro-copyright' exactly - being in favour of a widely supported legal mechanism isn't that controversial. It's that they are or have been members of industry-based groups with enthusiastic views on the ways in which such laws should be enforced, and future ones written.

Imagine, for instance, if a judge presiding over a movie copyright infringement case in the U.S. turned out to be a member of the MPAA. That would be rather more troublesome than if the judge had, at some point in their life, said "I think the principle of copyright is a good idea".

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Car analogy
by raboof on Sun 24th May 2009 18:04 in reply to "RE: Car analogy"
raboof Member since:

I understand the nuances - that ';)' wasn't there for nothing, ya'know...

Reply Parent Score: 1