Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th May 2009 12:08 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 365909
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Driver support???? YEAH!!!
by lemur2 on Fri 29th May 2009 03:14
in reply to "RE: Driver support???? YEAH!!!"
Not to rain down on your parade to much, but printer drivers do not live in the Linux-kernel.
Not to rain down on your parade to much, but LUK could probably accomodate running Windows printer drivers.
To further muddy this picture ... Linux rather than Windows probably has the more complete set of printer drivers. Since OEMs are expected to write Windows drivers, currently shipping versions of Windows will typically fail to have drivers for a lot of hardware that was out of production when the version of Windows first came out. Where is the incentive for a printer OEM to write a driver for Vista or Windows 7 for a printer model they stopped making (and therefore selling) some years ago?
This situation is exacerbated on Windows because both Vista and Windows 7, I believe, will not install the XP drivers that are typically all that the printer actually shipped with, and the Linux drivers won't work on Vista or Windows 7 either.




Member since:
2007-09-22
Not to rain down on your parade to much, but printer drivers do not live in the Linux-kernel. And to be complete, video-drivers don't live in the Linux-kernel either, we'll until recently anyway. They are moving a small part into the kernel now.