Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 12th Jun 2009 13:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 368307
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Opera's not popular because it's not popular
by Laurence on Sun 14th Jun 2009 21:28
in reply to "RE: Opera's not popular because it's not popular"
The UI is hideous,
I personally like it. But for those that don't, it can be changed easily enough.
it includes built-in features I don't want (the widgit system, I forget what it's called),
So don't use them then. Nobody is forcing you.
and it's missing features I do want (noscript and adblock, same as everyone else).
Opera has both those features. Granted they're not as intuitive as FF extensions, but they're still there.
There was a time, back when we were competing against IE 6, when a rapid and standards-compliant render was enough to be competitive. Now, most browser can pull off a good enough render in a small enough amount of time. Now, you need extra features to compete, and Opera is fairly lacking there.
Lacking? Opera has pioneered many features (eg tabs) - some of which a lot of browsers still don't have (eg speed dial)




Member since:
2009-02-19
The UI is hideous, it includes built-in features I don't want (the widgit system, I forget what it's called), and it's missing features I do want (noscript and adblock, same as everyone else).
There was a time, back when we were competing against IE 6, when a rapid and standards-compliant render was enough to be competitive. Now, most browser can pull off a good enough render in a small enough amount of time. Now, you need extra features to compete, and Opera is fairly lacking there.