Linked by Jordan Spencer Cunningham on Thu 25th Jun 2009 16:40 UTC
Back in April after the four involved in the Pirate Bay scuffle were declared guilty of helping to break copyright law, the judge who gave the verdict, Thomas Norstrom, was found to probably be biased due to his involvement in several pro-copyright groups. After a long, cold, hard bout of deliberation, the Swedish Court of Appeals has actually found Norstrom unbiased, something rather surprising. This means that the charges against the guilty still stand.
Thread beginning with comment 370486
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Good - ruling maybe, punishment.. no
by sbergman27 on Fri 26th Jun 2009 14:23
in reply to "RE[9]: Good - ruling maybe, punishment.. no"
Member since:2005-07-24
If you're so disinterested in proprietary content, why does this matter to you?
I dislike dishonesty, in general, and generally point it out when I see it. It is your dishonesty which matters to me. And on that account, my ethical responsibilies have been fulfilled.
Edited 2009-06-26 14:26 UTC
RE[11]: Good - ruling maybe, punishment.. no
by ringham on Fri 26th Jun 2009 14:29
in reply to "RE[10]: Good - ruling maybe, punishment.. no"
Member since:2006-03-23
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-03-23
If you're not at all interested in any of the proprietary content which is causing this stir, then why are you bothering to oppose me? If you're so disinterested in proprietary content, why does this matter to you?