Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 27th Sep 2005 22:40 UTC, submitted by Danijel Orsolic
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu "This follow-up to the previously published article 'Ubuntu: Derivative or Fork?' takes into account most of everything that has been posted as a reaction to the first article to present a general opinion and compare them with facts derived from various resouces. You'll see that peace can be achieved between these two, and ultimately any GNU/Linux group out there."
Thread beginning with comment 37157
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Come on
by on Tue 27th Sep 2005 22:50 UTC

Member since:

Really, this is flamebait... that wasn't necessary.

Reply Score: -2

RE: Come on
by BrianH on Tue 27th Sep 2005 23:04 in reply to "Come on"
BrianH Member since:

The other article that this followed up was definitely flamebait, but this one is not. It clears up much of the misunderstanding that was causing the previous flamewar and tries to reconcile the sides. It even explains in detail why it is appropriate for the various sides to "agree to disagree". This is the opposite of flamebait.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Come on
by on Tue 27th Sep 2005 23:16 in reply to "RE: Come on"
Member since:

Yeah, I agree. Although I don't see why either of these is getting this much attention. It seems like they are just glorified posts on a forum. Are either of these guys in any way a part of GNU/Linux development, or somehow otherwise involved in the community besides just being users?

Reply Parent Score: 0