Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Jul 2009 08:51 UTC, submitted by PLan
Mono Project We've already seen some heavy discussion on Mono and C# here on OSNews the past few weeks, as it became clear the patent situation regarding the ECMA parts of Mono was anything but faith inspiring. This issue seems to be resolved now: Microsoft has made a legally binding promise not to sue anyone who uses or distributes implementations of said ECMA standards. Following this news, Mono will be split in two; the ECMA standard parts, and the rest.
Thread beginning with comment 372060
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by kaiwai
by Thom_Holwerda on Tue 7th Jul 2009 10:59 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by kaiwai"
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

Except Amarok has vertical tabs, for which its developers will be sent to hell.

And of course, he was talking about the GNOME desktop.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai
by lemur2 on Tue 7th Jul 2009 11:10 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by kaiwai"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

Except Amarok has vertical tabs, for which its developers will be sent to hell.

And of course, he was talking about the GNOME desktop.


Of course he was talking about the GNOME desktop.

What he said (when you boil it down) was that in some cases, if you want the best applications for GNOME, then you must have Mono installed ... and I agree ... and what I then went on to say was that if you want equivalent good applications for Linux, without Mono dependencies, then the thing to do is switch your desktop to KDE4.

I tried to be brief ... but some people try to twist your meaning when you do that ... so if you want me always to ramble on with long explanations like the above, Thom, then you are going the right way about it.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Comment by kaiwai
by elsewhere on Tue 7th Jul 2009 16:34 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai"
elsewhere Member since:
2005-07-13

and what I then went on to say was that if you want equivalent good applications for Linux, without Mono dependencies, then the thing to do is switch your desktop to KDE4.


Switching desktops is overkill, KDE4 apps will run in Gnome; if anyone is willing to accept the overhead of mono for a music app or app launcher, then the kde base libs shouldn't be an issue either.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Comment by kaiwai
by r_a_trip on Wed 8th Jul 2009 14:35 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai"
r_a_trip Member since:
2005-07-06

Lemur, as an INTP to an INTJ, it sometimes does pay off to add more "fluff". I have no problems grasping the frame from which you write your posts, but our types form two minorities in the world.

I've always bumped into people not understanding me, to the point of me now explaining pretty much everything. Sometimes to the annoyance of the people around me.

As for KDE4 having comparable technology... Good to see alternatives available. It doesn't help though if you <u>want</u> to run Gnome as your desktop.

Still, if you only use ECMA-MONO + Gnome technology, you can use Tomboy, FSpot, Beagle and Gnome-DO safely, without having to worry about MS dragging you to court over their core .NET patents.

Now that MS has clarified their position on their patents, I wonder what the other ECMA participants Intel and HP think about their patents and the core of .NET.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai
by setec_astronomy on Tue 7th Jul 2009 11:11 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by kaiwai"
setec_astronomy Member since:
2007-11-17

Apperantly, Amarok 2 (afaik starting with 2.2) will use a breadcrumb - alike navigation concept to replace the vertical tabs.

http://amarok.kde.org/blog/archives/1016-From-the-Post-2.1.0-Git-Va...

http://amarok.kde.org/blog/archives/1056-From-the-Post-2.1.0-Git-Va...

Reply Parent Score: 2