Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Jul 2009 08:51 UTC, submitted by PLan
Thread beginning with comment 372082
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-05
There are two things that mono tries to do. The first is provide a modern, free platform to develop against. The second is to provide an easy way to port existing .net apps to linux.
If you are using mono to develop linux apps, you aren't going to use anything that is not covered by this promise, you are going to use the linux stack that has been built on top of mono. If you are using mono as a compatibility layer to deploy your .net apps on linux, the future legality of that is still up in the air.