Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Jul 2009 08:51 UTC, submitted by PLan
Thread beginning with comment 372104
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Did you read the article? the promise only covers what is standardised under the ECMA standard - the interesting parts like gdiplus, winforms, asp.net and so forth are excluded - so the threat still stands for those banking on mono to turn their winforms application into a multiplatform solution without needing to do extensive re-coding.
Yep, I read the article, however the article has nothing to do with your comment or my response. You were saying that Sun hasn't sued anyone over Java and that Apple hasn't sued anyone over OpenStep, and then insinuated that somehow that made them different than Microsoft. I then pointed out to you that Microsoft has also not sued anyone over Mono.
Again, winforms and asp.net, et al, are not the only interesting things about .Net. Those are useful libaries for doing Windows specific GUI development (WinForms), and Windows specific server side development (ASP.Net). For Linux, those things are useless, other than for possible cross platform migration.
But, again, the C# language itself is useful. The CLI itself is useful. And GTK# is very useful.




Member since:
2005-07-06
Did you read the article? the promise only covers what is standardised under the ECMA standard - the interesting parts like gdiplus, winforms, asp.net and so forth are excluded - so the threat still stands for those banking on mono to turn their winforms application into a multiplatform solution without needing to do extensive re-coding.