Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Jul 2009 15:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 374483
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'd really loooove to see some hard numbers showing how GNOME is so bloated compared to XFCE.
I can't comment on bloat of GNOME vs. Xfce. However, I run GNOME's NetworkManager applet under KDE (the KDE one doesn't work well for me) and I'm a bit confused why it loads gvfs-gphoto2-volume-monitor, some CD burning capability, etc. into my RAM.
I have enough RAM not to care a lot about those nm-applet dependencies. I'm just telling what I observe.
PS: Before anybody mentions it: WiCD doesn't work for me either.
hell, while your at it, Dump the bloated Gnome and use XFCE.
I know Xfce only from Xubuntu and at least there it looks almost identical to Ubuntu/GNOME with the only difference being that the default theme is blue instead of brown.
Personally, I don't understand the intention in developing two almost identical DEs when the main difference is a few different apps. It would be like Peter Penz developing his own Qt-based DE just because he didn't like Konqueror. Instead Dolphin was initially a 3rd party KDE 3.x application.







Member since:
2008-03-16
So why not just apt-get install thunar, then set it in Gnome as the default file manager?
hell, while your at it, Dump the bloated Gnome and use XFCE.