Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Jul 2009 22:53 UTC, submitted by Remy Chi Jian Suen
Thread beginning with comment 374948
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by lmjabreu
by lemur2 on Fri 24th Jul 2009 00:44
in reply to "RE: Comment by lmjabreu"
"I don't get it, what about this: http://www.osnews.com/story/21882/Microsoft_s_Linux_Kernel_Code_Dro... ? Doesn't Mr Linus know about the nature of that gpl code?
What about it? The code is GPL now right? So basically, Microsoft complied with the GPL as required, and should therefore not be bashed for it. " Precisely so.
However, the same incident is being used by Microsoft supporters to try to add to a negative smear on FOSS that the GPL "is viral". That is just not so.
RE[3]: Comment by lmjabreu
by Hiev on Fri 24th Jul 2009 01:01
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by lmjabreu"







Member since:
2007-07-25
What about it? The code is GPL now right? So basically, Microsoft complied with the GPL as required, and should therefore not be bashed for it.