Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Jul 2009 22:53 UTC, submitted by Remy Chi Jian Suen
Editorial So, Microsoft submits 20000 lines of code to the Linux kernel, all licensed under the GPL. Microsoft, who considers Linux a great threat, and once called the GPL a "cancer". Opinions on this one are flying all around us, but what does Linus Torvalds, Linux' benevolent dictator, think about all this?
Thread beginning with comment 375422
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No Linus, it's not about Microsoft-hating.
by Ex-Expat on Mon 27th Jul 2009 18:45 UTC
Member since:

As time goes on, I like Linus Torvalds less and less. He's all too willing to allow people to wrongly credit him for the whole free software movement instead of Richard Stallman. He doesn't actively claim it, but neither does he make any effort to set the record straight when mistakenly given this credit or when erroneously introduced as "the one who started it all." To add insult to injury, he does this while minimizing the role of the GNU programming and debugging tools that made the Linux kernel possible, the GNU GPL that enabled its popularity, and the entire GNU operating system started in 1984 that it fits into, all while teaching against the free software principles that put all those things in place. He's happy to have people call this combination "Linux," rather than GNU/Linux, even though Linux is just the kernel and makes up only about 1/10 as much code as the GNU software in a given "Linux" distribution.

I respect Linus highly as a programmer, and for his contributions to GNU/Linux' success. But I don't trust him as my IT morality compass - I think he's got it wrong and I am not impressed with his lack of integrity either.

Contrary to what Linus would have you believe, this is not about hating Microsoft. It's about fighting against those who wish to compromise our freedom by actively stifling competitors - especially free/libre open source software competitors. Microsoft has been convicted of a wide variety of antitrust practices, on numerous occasions, by U.S. and E.U. federal courts - and was recently fined again by the E.U. for not complying with the terms of the judgement against them. Just do a web search for "Microsoft antitrust" and see just how far down the rabbit hole goes. Anyone who so actively fights consumer choice is the enemy of the consumers and of the IT free market as a whole. Microsoft is but one exceptional example, but there are many others. And remember, there's a big difference between hating someone vs. hating what they do.

Reply Score: 1

sbergman27 Member since:

Contrary to what Linus would have you believe, this is not about hating Microsoft. It's about fighting against those who wish to compromise our freedom...

And the best way to accomplish that is to work on making the best alternative possible, promoting our alternative in a positive way, voting with our wallets, and presenting reasonable arguments for direct action against objectionable practices on the parts of those entities which are abusing their powers.

It's not about completely refraining from expressing disapproval of MS or other companies which infringe upon our freedoms and/or upon the workings of the free market. It is about not *obsessing* upon anti-Microsoftism, banging out post after slavvering post, radidly attacking Microsoft, deserved or not, making even OSS supporters nauseous with one's constant flow of bile.

It's about balance. It's about having a life, Ex-Expat.

And if you read OSNews regularly, you know that we have a few of those bile-spewers right here who need to take this issue very seriously, as they are doing more to hurt the OSS cause than Microsoft ever has.

Edited 2009-07-27 19:43 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2