Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 30th Jul 2009 16:16 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Linux Valerie Aurora has published a great article in LWN about btrfs: "You probably have heard of the cool new kid on the file system block - after all, Linus Torvalds is using it as his root file system on one of his laptops. But you might not know much about it beyond a few high-level keywords - copy-on-write, checksums, writable snapshots - and a few sensational rumors and stories - the Phoronix benchmarks, btrfs is a ZFS ripoff, btrfs is a secret plan for Oracle domination of Linux, etc. When it comes to file systems, it's hard to tell truth from rumor from vile slander. In this article, we'll take a behind-the-scenes look at the design and development of btrfs on many levels."
Thread beginning with comment 376257
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: ButterFS
by thavith_osn on Fri 31st Jul 2009 04:17 UTC in reply to "ButterFS"
thavith_osn
Member since:
2005-07-11

BetterFS (or ButterFS - lol) is a terrible name for the OS.

It's like adding "new" to something. At some point something comes along that is newer. At some point something will come along that is "better"...

Better is a relative term. I would just have to come out with BestOS :-)

I think LG's "Life's Good" catch phrase has similar problems. I'd love someone to come out with "Life's Great".

Oh, I don't have any better suggestions though...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: ButterFS
by WereCatf on Fri 31st Jul 2009 04:30 in reply to "RE: ButterFS"
WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

BetterFS (or ButterFS - lol) is a terrible name for the OS.

It is not an OS... It is a filesystem.

For a filesystem BtrFS is perfectly suitable; no Joe User will care what filesystem they use or what's its name, and system admins and geeks actually understand the idea behind that name..

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[3]: ButterFS
by phoenix on Sun 2nd Aug 2009 04:52 in reply to "RE[2]: ButterFS"
phoenix Member since:
2005-07-11

BetterFS (or ButterFS - lol) is a terrible name for the OS.

It is not an OS... It is a filesystem.

For a filesystem BtrFS is perfectly suitable; no Joe User will care what filesystem they use or what's its name, and system admins and geeks actually understand the idea behind that name..


Yeah, they should have gone for either the full expansion BTreeFS, or the more proper abbreviation BTFS. BTrFS or BtrFS just looks weird, and is pronounced even weirder. ;)

But, it's too late for that. And besides, what's in a name? ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2