Linked by David Adams on Thu 30th Jul 2009 23:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 376390
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Excuse me, I don't give a s*** about iPhone...
by sbergman27 on Fri 31st Jul 2009 19:42
in reply to "RE: Excuse me, I don't give a s*** about iPhone..."
I'm confused. How is being 'over-featured' a bad thing? Is 'under-featured' better?
Over-featured is when, for example, in an spreadsheet application, there are so many options controlling what the fonts look like in the graphs, what color they are, what face they are, what rotation they are, what kind of hinting they use, whether the background should be solid, pattern, gradient, or image, how thick the lines between cells should be, what color they should be, whether they should be dashed, double dashed, solid, or transucent, and if tranlucent, then what should the level of translucency be, whether the borders should be sharp, bevelled, hybrid, inset, raised, or rounded, and what percentage of strontification should be used on the splinelets... that you can spend hours and hours trying to figure out how to tell it what *data* to present and come away frustrated and unsuccessful.
Now, I don't have an iPhone, and would never buy one. But for a phone, over-featured might involve it having so many extra-phonal features that its hard to figure out how to, say, call 911.
Edited 2009-07-31 19:47 UTC




Member since:
2009-04-08
For me, It's an over-featured microsoftesque shit.
I'm confused. How is being 'over-featured' a bad thing? Is 'under-featured' better?
BTW, the iPhone is quite popular among the Apple fans I know so I don't understand that comment.