To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
ATI driver have a problem with 4.3. Who is responsible is yet to be clear. About other resizing bug, as I said in that post, "normal" resizing protocol is time based, not direct. KDE3 and Gnome2 use(d) an hack to have pixel per pixel resize. It is not part of X protocol and is inofficial, but Qt 4.6 will support that walk around protocol. So it is not really Qt/KDE problem, but it is just how resize should behave on Linux, even if it look slow.
Your machine wouldn't have Intel graphics by any chance would it?
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_q309_flake...
On my test machine, KDE 4.3 is faster than any previous version of KDE (including KDE 3 series) and faster than GNOME.
Edited 2009-08-05 02:35 UTC
QT4 over engineered their rendering engines. They did it to get all the fancy effects like AA, composing, etc. Unfortunately they tanked their performance for CAD type applications and pretty much tossed any hope of running remote display/remote terminal applications.
It's a shame and probably all this stuff needs to be ripped out, refactored and dramatically simplified, like the whole rest of QT.





Member since:
2007-11-03
See this comment to Thom's review, it is a known bug http://www.osnews.com/permalink?375523