Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th Aug 2009 16:23 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Thread beginning with comment 379766
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-20
Just because browsers are generally free doesn't mean that there is no money in browsers. Mozilla, Opera, etc. share revenue with the search engines they pass on traffic to. There's a lot of money there.
Also, he who controls the browser controls the web. The web is too important to be "owned" by one single company. From that perspective, Opera and Mozilla's involvement makes perfect sense: Both of them have been spending HUGE amounts of resources to promote an open web.
Apple and Linux distros are not monopolies. Microsoft is. The big deal is that Microsoft has tried to lock people to their own products.
If said computer manufacturer had a monopoly, and illegaly abused said monopoly.
Yes they should, if they break the law, and this is the only way to restore the free market.