Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Aug 2009 05:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 379937
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
US labor laws allow the unions to do that.
by MollyC on Sat 22nd Aug 2009 17:53
in reply to "Comment by kaiwai"
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Some might see this as collusion and cartel like but how is it any different to unions restricting supply of labour and pushing up the price of labour. If one is going to have labour unions and allow the sorts of laws in some places which call for compulsory unionism - then at the same time it would be consistent to then allow companies to have an agreement not to poach each others talent.